What is proverty

Poverty is an "acid that drips on the pride is worn away "POVERTY" is destroying a lot's of  life. Poverty is a curse ,as a chisel that chips on honor until honor is worn away. We can defines poverty in many away like "poverty is being tired", "poverty is dirt","poverty is asking for help" and "poverty is looking in black future this shows you that there is no hope for the poor without understanding.
Here is a story of a lady whose husband has left(died) her of poverty "She says that she doesn't have clean clothes , neither any clean house . she calls hot water a "luxury" which is beyond her expectation. Her children do not have any extra books, magazines,extra pencils, crayons or paper. she says ,talking about her children , that most important of all, they do not have health- they have worms, they have infections,they have pink eyes all summer.she have left her job for the children because she afford the nursery school and she have to take care of her children  

thinking

This is about only thinking. When people don't have to do anything to do and only think of anything this is such a waste of  time but it make people  too easy to past the time this make them lazy but who cares.
Yesterday i meet a friend he said me that she was thinking of  me whole day and she thought that i had married , then i had a kids although i am single and i love her .........

story of love

Affection is a "disposition or rare state of mind or body"^[1] that is often associated with a feeling or type of love. It has given rise to a number of branches of philosophy and psychology concerning: emotion (popularly: love, devotion etc.); disease; influence; state of being (philosophy)^[2]; and state of mind (psychology). "Affection" is popularly used to denote a feeling or type of love, amounting to more than goodwill or friendship. Writers on ethics generally use the word to refer to distinct states of feeling, both lasting and spasmodic. Some contrast it with passion as being free from the distinctively sensual element.
More specifically, the word has been restricted to emotional states, the object of which is a person. In the former sense, it is the Greek "pathos" and as such it appears in the writings of French philosopher René Descartes, Dutch philosopher Baruch Spinoza, and most of the writings of early British ethicists. However, on various grounds (e.g., that it does not involve anxiety or excitement and that it is comparatively inert and compatible with the entire absence of the sensuous element), it is generally and usefully distinguished from passion. In this narrower sense the word has played a great part in ethical systems, which have spoken of the social or parental affections as in some sense a part of moral obligation. For a consideration of these and similar problems, which depend ultimately on the degree in which the affections are regarded as voluntary, see H. Sidgwick, Methods of Ethics pp. 345–349.